<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad spelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/</link>
	<description>Expat adventures Down Under</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Indeed! I was going to write "Whingeing Pom" when setting up my categories; however, I noticed that a lot of people seem to spell it without the 'e'. So I searched for both variants on Google and came up with the rather surprising result:

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whingeing
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whinging

In fact, Google even suggests that you spell it "whinging"!

So in this case I acted like a sheep and went with the commonly used spelling, rather than the "correct" spelling. Such is how language evolves I guess! I think "Whinging" looks nicer too. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! I was going to write &#8220;Whingeing Pom&#8221; when setting up my categories; however, I noticed that a lot of people seem to spell it without the &#8216;e&#8217;. So I searched for both variants on Google and came up with the rather surprising result:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whingeing" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whingeing</a><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whinging" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com.au/search?q=whinging</a></p>
<p>In fact, Google even suggests that you spell it &#8220;whinging&#8221;!</p>
<p>So in this case I acted like a sheep and went with the commonly used spelling, rather than the &#8220;correct&#8221; spelling. Such is how language evolves I guess! I think &#8220;Whinging&#8221; looks nicer too. <img src='http://tgo.elated.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viv doyle</title>
		<link>http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>viv doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tgo.elated.com/2007/05/08/bad-spelling/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Since you're on about spelling, surely that should read whingeing pom? The 'e' softens the 'g' otherwise it is like winging!!!

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re on about spelling, surely that should read whingeing pom? The &#8216;e&#8217; softens the &#8216;g&#8217; otherwise it is like winging!!!</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
